MyWork24 Knowledge Base
Article

The Incident Log (QIL): how a disciplinary incident works

Edit

The Incident Log (QIL): how a disciplinary incident works

What this guide covers

The Incident Log (QIL) is how the company records and handles disciplinary matters fairly and defensibly. This explains the two tracks (verbal vs formal), the lifecycle of a formal incident, and the Sanction Lock that guarantees an employee's right to reply before any sanction. The deep-dive guides cover each screen.

Who can use it: raising incidents needs the incident-create permission; imposing a sanction needs the sanction permission; the dashboard needs HR-admin. Managers see incidents they raised or about their own team; HR admins see all. This is sensitive, legal-grade information — treat everything here as strictly confidential.

The lifecycle

How a disciplinary incident works: an incident is raised, then either the Verbal track (logged and closed immediately) or the Formal track (Pending Employee Ack with sanction locked and a 24-hour reply window; once the employee acknowledges or the window expires it becomes Ready for Sanction with the lock released; a sanction officer imposes a sanction and it is Closed). The Sanction Lock is system-enforced; acknowledging is not an admission of guilt; the employee can reply in a private thread; everything is audited.

The two tracks

Track When Flow
Verbal Warning / Counselling Minor matters — a recorded conversation. Logged and Closed immediately as a record.
Formal Incident Report Serious matters. Goes through the right-to-reply window and the Sanction Lock before any sanction.

The formal lifecycle in words

  1. Raised → the incident enters Pending Employee Acknowledgement. A message notifies the employee with a link; they have 24 hours to review and reply. The Sanction Lock is on — no sanction can be issued yet.
  2. Acknowledged, or 24h expires → the incident becomes Ready for Sanction and the lock is released.
  3. Impose sanction → a sanction officer chooses a level on the disciplinary ladder (verbal → first written → final written → dismissal hearing) and the incident is Closed.

The principles that make it fair

  • Sanction Lock is server-enforced. A formal sanction genuinely cannot be imposed until the employee acknowledges or the window passes — it can't be bypassed in the UI or otherwise.
  • Acknowledging = "received and read", not guilt. The employee keeps the right to dispute.
  • A private reply thread lets the employee state their case to HR (the manager can't see it) — "hear the other side."
  • Everything is audited. Every step is recorded on an append-only timeline; facts can only be amended before the employee engages.
  • It links to the ladder. Enough verbal warnings in the window open a formal escalation in the disciplinary inbox.

The guides in this section

Guide For
Raising an incident Managers/HR logging a verbal or formal incident.
The formal process: acknowledgement, Sanction Lock & sanction Working a formal incident through to a decision.
If an incident is raised about you The employee's review-and-acknowledge guide.
Incident dashboard (HR) HR's overview of where incidents are stuck.
  • Disciplinary Report — one employee's whole-picture view (incidents + escalations + attendance + KPI).
  • Disciplinary Escalations — the attendance-strike ladder that QIL also feeds.

Related articles